CRTC examines net neutrality
Hearings are this week. Some articles by Michael Geist, and a great summary of the issues on CBC.
Update: Michael Geist with some info from Day 1 of the net neutrality hearings:
It was the consumer presentation that did the most to link network management to the law and it also highlighted reason for great concern. I think that the consumer groups rightly focused on who should bear the burden of demonstrating that DPI and other Internet traffic controls are consistent with current Canadian law. The groups argued that these are prima facie violations of Section 36 of the Telecommunications Act and that the onus therefore should fall on the carriers to show that there is a serious problem, the solution minimally impairs users’ rights, and is proportional to the harm.
Unfortunately, the questions that followed suggest that the CRTC Commissioners start these hearings having accepted the carriers’ claims that congestion is a problem and that inhibiting the use of deep packet inspection could result in increased consumer costs for Internet access. This suggests that there is a steep mountain to climb in these hearings, leading me to believe that the issue will ultimately be a political one with pressure on the Conservatives to join with the Liberals and NDP in supporting net neutrality.
Too bad, really. Congestion was never a problem for me, not on DSL, anyway. Now I my p2p crawls during peak times… maybe I should set up MLPPP… TekSavvy supports it, and apparently it bypasses throttling…
